This phrase has nagged me ever since I came across it many years ago. Only the phrase remains in my memory; its origin is lost. When I typed this phrase into a search engine recently, I realized it's not only a meme, it's code for a harmless, valueless woman...
The Urban Dictionary uses this phrase in explaining the term "Dignified Doormat": "A soft-spoken woman who sits with her hands folded neatly in her lap and smiles graciously while her husband runs the country into the ground," citing former First Lady Laura Bush as an example.
A book with a character called China Sorrows also sits with her hands folded neatly in her lap. Another character, Cath, not only sits with hands folded, etc., but also with knees tucked underneath her body (sounds even more uncomfortable). A 99-cent downloadable eromance places the heroine "primly on the carriage seat" in addition to the hands thing. Another character "summons all her self control" to sit still with her back straight and, yes, hands folded... you know the rest.
So how do you sit with improperly folded, untidy hands in your lap? Do you make Keith Moon arabesques in the air above your lap instead? https://www.morrisonhotelgallery.com/photo/default.aspx?photographID=3224 (please note that this image is copyrighted by Al Satterwhite). Do you just casually flip the bird (like Don Stevenson on the cover of the first Moby Grape record http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moby_Grape_(album) with one of those neat hands until someone notices?
Hands, and feet too, have long been a subject of aesthetic expression, symbolism and controlled movements, both figuring crucially in ritual and popular dance. During the American Civil War, Freemasons proffered secret hand signals to the enemy when captured in the effort to stay alive, with success when recognized by a fellow Mason.
I won't go into the whole foot fetish thing here, there's undoubtedly more than enough of that stuff on the internet already. Let it suffice to say that footwear speaks volumes about one's lifestyle.

http://www.cmog.org/artwork/2-beaded-slippers-bound-feet Thanks to the Corning Museum of Glass for this image of footwear that has tiny glass beads covering the entire surface including the soles.
I won't go into the whole foot fetish thing here, there's undoubtedly more than enough of that stuff on the internet already. Let it suffice to say that footwear speaks volumes about one's lifestyle.

http://www.cmog.org/artwork/2-beaded-slippers-bound-feet Thanks to the Corning Museum of Glass for this image of footwear that has tiny glass beads covering the entire surface including the soles.
If you didn't have to work for a living in the Middle Ages, you could wear sleeves long enough to cover your hands, clearly marking you as someone who never gets close to a broom.
Moderns have a love-hate relationship with these gracious women who sit with their hands folded neatly in their laps. Who is the least cool person who dares to claim space in the world of culture? Not the snarky, debt-laden art school grad impatiently waiting for you to decide what to order; that's more like feeling sorry for spawning salmon.
Not the comically unaware mythical middle-americans; they can't be touched since they don't care what you think. Not overpaid, overhyped art stars, even if you think you hate them; because deep down you wanna win the lottery too (okay, not you, just the other three people who read this).
No, the most sincere scorn is reserved for the Matron, the Lady of Leisure. Not a struggling young mom twisting earwires between potty-training sessions; not the heroic iconoclast spraying paint onto the side of a building at 3am.
Save your ire for the one below on the right, who donates time to a charitable arts group, part of the duties that come with marrying one of the wealthiest capitalists in the western hemisphere (that's him at left):
Save your ire for the one below on the right, who donates time to a charitable arts group, part of the duties that come with marrying one of the wealthiest capitalists in the western hemisphere (that's him at left):
Pretty f'n far from edgy, eh?

That's the macro version. Micro versions abound---everyday middle-aged women who have some spare change to throw toward non-credit art classes and materials, who appear to be blissfully unconcerned by art and craft world storms. They're coming from a safe place and going to a safe place. They're hardly clueless; they might look ironically at Bob Ross and Thomas Kincade (described by critic Jed Perl as "catnip for psychopathologists"
http://www.tnr.com/book/review/thomas-kinkade#); they might visit or even participate in the local Open Studios, but the assumption is that they're not terribly willing to get uncomfortable.
http://www.tnr.com/book/review/thomas-kinkade#); they might visit or even participate in the local Open Studios, but the assumption is that they're not terribly willing to get uncomfortable.
Doesn't sound like a big deal, does it? Well... it has literally unhealthy consequenses. Kate McKinnnon's critiques of the dangerously casual handling of craft-class safety issues by hobby professionals and organizations http://katemckinnon.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/i-get-mail/ (also see her many related posts) offer evidence that these hobbyists are considered to be little more than expendable money-printing machines. Not a tragedy on anywhere near the order of magnitude of the Bangladeshi garment factory workers, but one that clearly has a negative effect on many ordinary people.
So how to flesh out these marginally-more-subtle-than-playground-bully cultural assumptions? Well, with my level of resources and high-ranking contacts... lampooning this subject through bead-weaving, of course. I had the privilege of collaborating with glass artist Laura Bowker (http://www.lbglass.net/) recently. Laura trusted me with the engraved glass disc bead near the center of the photo at top. I decided to make a purposely-marginally-wearable ring with it.
As I worked, I thought about wearability, function, restriction, ornament, assumed roles... and decided to make a ring with an extra loop to allow the wearer to Keep Her Hands Folded Neatly in Her Lap. The second loop blends in so it's not clearly seen, kind of like the just-below-the-radar ways we try to keep each other in line.
Having to work around a non-ergonomic device, whether it's wearing art jewelry or reaching for the windshield wiper button in a 1968 Dodge Dart, changes your orientation and even your immediate reality. Cars that are almost too easy to drive lull us into driving too fast and texting.
You have to pay a bit more attention when piloting a 1934 Ford coupe with mechanical brakes and no power steering, than you would with a modern car (I know, car fans, this one probably has newer running gear; sure looks nice, though). Ever have to bring a car to a stop after the engine dies? You'll put that phone down pretty fast.

You have to pay a bit more attention when piloting a 1934 Ford coupe with mechanical brakes and no power steering, than you would with a modern car (I know, car fans, this one probably has newer running gear; sure looks nice, though). Ever have to bring a car to a stop after the engine dies? You'll put that phone down pretty fast.
Wearing art jewelry sometimes means making allowances. You might have to give up the wheel to another driver, you can't get your coat on and off, you can't fall asleep on the couch without wrecking it. What does this to to your awareness?





,+detail.jpg)



































